• Contact
  • About
DONATE
NEWSLETTER SIGN UP
  • Login
North East Bylines
  • Home
  • News
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Business
  • Region
  • Opinion
AUDIO
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Business
  • Region
  • Opinion
No Result
View All Result
North East Bylines
Home News Brexit

Are referendums past their sell-by date?

It begs the question as to whether referenda are fair or democratic in making far-reaching decisions?

Stephen LambertbyStephen Lambert
15-04-2021 04:16 - Updated On 12-04-2022 17:14
in Brexit, Politics, UK
Reading Time: 4 mins
A A
yes or now?

Photo from iStock (editor holds licence)

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

The referendum, as we saw over the EU, in June 2016, is a device by which the people are directly asked to give a YES/NO decision to a specific policy issue.

The referendum, for some, can be seen as the panacea for low democratic engagement. Yet the Brexit result is having profound consequences for both the UK and North East. The outcome is providing a significant challenge to our region: Not only from the loss of the EU single market, but also from the prospect of a second Scottish independence referendum.

It begs the question as to whether referenda are fair or democratic in making far-reaching decisions? Are they merely a blunt instrument that panders to narrow sectional interests which in turn undermines the democratic process? Till recently referenda in the UK were seen as a popular continental device not suited to our nation’s system of representative democracy based on the sovereignty of Parliament. 

Yet referenda are now new in Britain. The main precedent was the first national referendum to stay in or leave the EEC in 1975. The reasons for the referendum were that the membership of the Common Market was of great constitutional significance, affecting British sovereignty. But arguably it was an instrument for preserving the unity of the Labour Government. A constitutional crisis was avoided because the verdict was what the Government recommended.

Since 1975 there have been a number of referenda on a range of issues including devolution for Scotland and Wales in 1997, the Northern Ireland Good Friday Agreement in 1998; 30 local referenda on to see whether citizens wanted elected Mayors and the 2016 EU referendum.

Another problem is that under a sovereign parliament the referendum could be what is termed a ”consultative referendum” or advisory. Since it would not have been legally binding on the government it was, as one critic put it, a ”constitutional nonsense”. For some, the Supreme Court’s decision to refer the matter of the outcome of the EU referendum to Parliament was the right one.

There remains a good case for the use of referenda in the UK’s liberal democracy. One, it answers a particular question, which a general election can’t. Two, the answer of a referendum is precise and can advise and mandate a government on a controversial issue. Three, it’s a form of ‘direct democracy’ by encouraging political participation, educating voters and raising awareness of issues. Turn-out in the 2016 Referendum was 72% – higher than the 2015 general election. Four, it legitimises constitutional change. Finally, it can unite a divided party.

On the other hand scholars such as the veteran Parliamentarian Ken Clarke are against the use of referenda in British government. For Clarke, the referendum is not a ”normal” feature of UK representative democracy. It’s not legally binding. It’s more suited to Europe. As PM Clement Attlee pointed out in 1946 it’s ”a device alien to our traditions”. For Attlee referenda have been easy devices for dictators to exploit. For others, the referendum undermines Parliamentary sovereignty and reduces the role of democratically elected MPs. True, they may result in more participatory democracy, but it could lead to weak or indecisive government ready to pander to popular will rather than provide a strong lead on thorny issues.

For some writers, some sections of the electorate are emotional, ill-informed and prejudicial: to some extent this came out in the debate about Britain’s continued membership of Europe. Yet for academics like Mathew Goodwin, Professor of Politics at Manchester university, people knew exactly what they were voting for – Brexit represented a ”popular English uprising against a liberal establishment”. That said, the late Roy Jenkins, Home Secretary in 1967, doubted if any progressive legislation would have been passed this way, especially in the areas of abortion, race and sex equality and decriminalising homosexuality.

Other critics point out that there’s the danger of governments using ”leading questions” when designing referendums. Some issues are too complex for a simple Yes/No response. Some political scientists believe that governments only have them when they think they will win. Certainly David Cameron, former Conservative PM, was confident of a Yes vote in the June 23 EU referendum.

Whatever the merits and flaws some writers do acknowledge that referenda can be a useful addition to democratic government with sufficient safeguards and if used infrequently. But with the SNP government threatening to break up the UK with a second Scottish independence referendum are we using referenda as dorm of democracy on demand? There’s a real risk of these becoming a ”never-endum” with consequent political fatigue.

Previous Post

Hartlepool: the last leg

Next Post

Homes for Heroes on Teesside policy launched by Jessie Joe Jacobs

Stephen Lambert

Stephen Lambert

Born and brought up in Newcastle , Stephen runs Education4Democracy - a social enterprise company having been a college lecturer in two North East colleges in the last 30 years. Stephen is a Newcastle City Councillor. In 1987 and 1992 he contested the Berwick-Upon-Tweed and Roxburgh constituencies (Labour) at both general elections. Stephen is an established citizen journalist and has published widely in The Journal, Chronicle, Sunday Sun, Northern Echo, Newsquest, Northumberland Gazette, LGA First and Post-16 Educator on a range of public policy related issues. He has also contributed to social media sites such as Labour List, FE News and North East Bylines.

Related Posts

Palestinians and Israelis book by Michael Scott-Baumann
Books

Book review: Palestinians and Israelis

byGiuseppe Bignardi
December 1, 2023
COP28 Trees
Environment

What can we expect from COP28?

byNeil Taylor
November 30, 2023
Brexit and EU signs
Brexit

Job seekers sanctions, mobility, and migration: the effect of Brexit

byDr Jayne Hamilton
November 30, 2023
Saudi flag
North East

Saudi Arabia – what can local politicians do?

byColin Taylor
November 28, 2023
Geert Wilders
Politics

Far-right roundup

byRobin Tudge
November 28, 2023
Next Post
homeless man

Homes for Heroes on Teesside policy launched by Jessie Joe Jacobs

PLEASE SUPPORT OUR CROWDFUNDER

Subscribe to our newsletters
CHOOSE YOUR NEWS
Follow us on social media
CHOOSE YOUR PLATFORMS
Download our app
ALL OF BYLINES IN ONE PLACE
Subscribe to our gazette
CONTRIBUTE TO OUR SUSTAINABILITY
Make a monthly or one-off donation
DONATE NOW
Help us with our hosting costs
SIGN UP TO SITEGROUND
We are always looking for citizen journalists
WRITE FOR US
Volunteer as an editor, in a technical role, or on social media
VOLUNTEER FOR US
Something else?
GET IN TOUCH
Previous slide
Next slide

LATEST

bluebells

1,750 native bulbs and flowers to bring colour and to enhance wellbeing in Kenton

December 2, 2023
Palestinians and Israelis book by Michael Scott-Baumann

Book review: Palestinians and Israelis

December 1, 2023

December 1, 2023
Newcastle Civic Centre

City Council to take over Your Homes Newcastle

December 1, 2023
Kim McGuinness

Government urged to fund £20mn initial work for new railway and at least seven new stations

December 1, 2023
Thousands of dead and dying crustaceans were found along Teesside’s coastlines last year. FlorianKunde/Shutterstock

Crustacean die-off report: more questions than answers

November 30, 2023 - Updated On December 1, 2023

MOST READ

Nestle Fawdon

New buyer for Fawdon Nestlé chocolate site

November 28, 2023
Photo by Fred Duval/Shutterstock.com (YW)

Cleverly and Stockton

November 27, 2023
Bollard in Geelong

What news from Geelong? The show goes on with Britishvolt

November 24, 2023 - Updated On November 27, 2023
Polling station

Proportional Representation vs First Past the Post

November 6, 2022 - Updated On May 23, 2023

BROWSE BY TAGS

Audio Beach Brexit Business castle leazes climate activism Co. Durham comedy cost of living crisis Culture defra democracy ducklings Economy Education Environment fire and rescue firefighter Food & Drink food poverty hardwick festival Health Health & Care Home Affairs just stop oil Lifestyle Local Lockdown Northumberland Peace peoples theatre Performance Politics pride month refugee rescue Science Teesside the good life TV & Radio Tynemouth Tyneside Ukraine volunteer Wearside

We are a not-for-profit citizen journalism publication. Our aim is to publish well-written, fact-based articles and opinion pieces on subjects that are of interest to people in the North East and beyond.

North East Bylines is a trading brand of Bylines Network Limited, which is a partner organisation to Byline Times.

Learn more about us

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Authors
  • Complaints
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Letters
  • Privacy
  • Network Map
  • Network RSS Feeds
  • Submission Guidelines

© 2023 North East Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Education
    • Environment
    • UK News
    • Transport
    • World News
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • Lifestyle
    • Culture
    • Music
    • Poetry
  • Business
    • Economy
    • Technology
    • Trade
  • Donate
  • Newsletter sign up
  • Boriiis Cartoons
  • Authors
  • Audio
CROWDFUNDER

© 2023 North East Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In