• Contact
  • About
  • ISSN 3049-9763
  • Authors and editors
NEWSLETTER SIGN UP
North East Bylines
Advertisement
  • Home
  • News
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Business
  • Region
  • Opinion
AUDIO
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Business
  • Region
  • Opinion
No Result
View All Result
North East Bylines
Home News Health

AI is not your doctor: survey shows potential risks

Survey shows that Google AI Overviews put people at risk of harm with misleading health advice

Peter Sagar by Peter Sagar
06-01-2026 06:55
in Health, Technology
Reading Time: 5 mins read
A A
person using mobile phone

Photo by Priscilla Du Preez 🇨🇦 on Unsplash

Share on Bluesky

Using google AI overviews has become part of the normal pattern of internet behaviour for millions of us.  But are the overviews always accurate and shouldn’t we be concerned if vital information, such as health advice, is not correct?

Google AI overviews

It was noted last year that a new option called AI Overviews had appeared on Google search. It was also argued that Google’s new AI search offering was likely to “change the internet, for better or worse”.

Just about every provider seems to be adding AI into their products with the development and launch of OpenAI’s ChatGPT and newer competitors such as DeepSeek. There has  been criticism of Meta’s WhatsApp because of its blue AI circle, which can be difficult to avoid.

It was also stated that “Google officially pushed its AI Search at its Google I/O event on 20 May, where it claimed that people using AI Overviews are finding it so useful, they’re even using search more often. In its biggest markets including the US and India, the tool is driving over 10% increase in usage of Google for the types of queries that show AI Overviews, the tech giant claimed”.

However, there have also long been fears of the accuracy of these overviews and when challenged it has been found that they are not always as good as they would appear to be…

Misleading health advice

This is particularly worrying when concerned with health information and advice, which it is of course vital to get right.  A survey by the Guardian found that there is the risk of people being put at harm due to misleading and incorrect health information in Google’s artificial intelligence overviews.

The AI Overviews use generative AI to provide quick summaries of essential information about a topic or question, are said to be  “helpful” and “reliable”. according to Google.

However, the survey by the Guardian found that the AI overviews often put people at risk of harm by providing false information.

There was one example which was described as “really dangerous”, by Google which saw people with pancreatic cancer being wrongly advised to  to avoid high-fat foods. Experts said that doing this could increase the risk of patients dying from the disease, as it is the opposite of what should be recommended.

Google was also found to have provided false information about crucial liver function tests, which could “leave people with serious liver disease wrongly thinking they are healthy”.

In a third example, information that was described as “completely wrong” was given regarding women’s cancer tests, which it is feared could see real symptoms being ignored by sufferers.

Bad advice everywhere

This survey backs up other studies about the veracity of health information on the internet. It has been pointed out that the internet is not the same as your doctor, even though greater numbers of  people are now asking AI for health advice, whether it be about wanting to know pills to take, what to eat, what treatments to try or advice about symptoms they may be suffering. It is said to feel quick, easy, and anonymous.

However, it is also judged to be a risky way of getting health information. AI tools are not the same as human doctors and don’t always know what they’re talking about. They are simply machines which get information from other online sources, some of which are reliable, while some are not.

The consequence of this is that millions of people are now getting answers to their health queries that sound clever and correct. but can actually be, as the survey in the Guardian found, really dangerous.

AI is not your doctor

The key takeaway from this seems to be that we all have to be very careful when looking online for advice about health issues, or anything else for that matter.  However, health issues can be particularly dangerous if the wrong advice is given and it seems that it is important to always remember that an AI overview is simply giving you quick access to other information on the internet, which may or may not be true.

Most importantly AI is not the same as a human doctor and a human doctor is whose advice should be heeded regarding any health issue.

Previous Post

A predawn op in Latin America

Next Post

A winter in Oceania: part 3 Solomon Islands, Tulagi

Peter Sagar

Peter Sagar

Peter is a teacher, writer and historian who has also been active in human rights work for 35 years. He is particularly interested in how our great human rights history in the North East can help us to be both inspired and enlightened and enable us to face up to the challenges we face today. These challenges include defending the human rights of all people in the region and the country and dealing with the existential crisis that is climate change

Related Posts

woman checking phone
Technology

Keeping yourself safe from scams

by Peter Sagar
8 September 2026
Two children from the Abu Shouk IDP Camp. Picture by Sudan Envoy
Health

Worsening humanitarian crisis in Sudan

by Peter Sagar
4 September 2026
New pharmacy in Kenton
Health

New Kenton chemist opens up following local community campaign

by North East Bylines
28 August 2026
AI concept
Technology

Requesting a council service in Newcastle – with the help of Jeff Bezos

by Peter Morris
20 August 2026
computer hacker surrounded by computer code
Technology

Scam news for mid-August

by Peter Sagar
15 August 2026
Next Post
Tulagi

A winter in Oceania: part 3 Solomon Islands, Tulagi

PLEASE SUPPORT OUR CROWDFUNDER

BROWSE BY TAGS

#BenHouchen Ben Houchen Business Co. Durham community Culture Darlington Durham Economy Education entertainment Environment Equality Finance Funding Gateshead Hartlepool Health History Housing Human Rights Local Lockdown Middlesbrough Newcastle North East Northumberland Online safety opinion Peace Politics Redcar Short Story Sunday STDC Stockton Sunderland Technology Teesside Teesworks Transport TVCA Tyneside Ukraine Wearside Which?

We are a not-for-profit citizen journalism publication. Our aim is to publish well-written, fact-based articles and opinion pieces on subjects that are of interest to people in the North East and beyond.

North East Bylines is a trading brand of Bylines Networks Limited which is separate to, but allied with, Byline Times.

Learn more about us

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Authors and editors
  • Complaints
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Letters
  • Privacy
  • Network Map
  • Network RSS Feeds
  • Submission Guidelines
  • Download the Bylines Network App

© 2020-2026 North East Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9763

No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Education
    • Environment
    • UK News
    • Transport
    • World News
  • Opinion
  • Lifestyle
    • Culture
    • Music
    • Poetry
  • Business
    • Economy
    • Technology
    • Trade
  • Audio
  • Authors and editors

Newsletter sign up

CROWDFUNDER

© 2020-2026 North East Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9763