• Contact
  • About
  • ISSN 3049-9763
  • Authors and editors
NEWSLETTER SIGN UP
North East Bylines
Advertisement
  • Home
  • News
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Business
  • Region
  • Opinion
AUDIO
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Business
  • Region
  • Opinion
No Result
View All Result
North East Bylines
Home Region Co. Durham

Council tax shock for thousands of Durham’s poorest – thanks to Reform UK

Durham will scrap full council-tax rebates, forcing 26,000 low-income working-age residents to start paying for the first time

Peter Morris by Peter Morris
22-11-2025 07:22
in Co. Durham, Politics
Reading Time: 4 mins read
A A
Arms of Durham County Council

Arms of Durham County Council Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license

Share on Bluesky

Around 26,000 of the neediest people in County Durham will have to start paying council tax next year as the county council scraps 100% rebates for people of working age. About 2,400 others who already pay some council tax will lose part of their rebate.

More than 24,000 of those affected will pay up to £5 a week and more than 3,000 will pay between £5 and £10. Women and the disabled will be disproportionately affected but pensioners and the terminally ill will be protected.

Some of the most deprived areas of the county are among those with the heaviest concentrations of residents affected, including areas in and around Stanley, Seaham, Peterlee, Brandon and Consett. These are also places that elected Reform councillors in May.

Reform-controlled Durham County Council’s cabinet decided on 19 November to revise its local council tax reduction scheme (LCTRS) for the poorest residents of working age for the first time since it was introduced in 2013. The maximum rebate, at present uncapped, is being cut from 100% of their tax bills to 90%, meaning everyone will pay something.

A report to the cabinet by Paul Darby, corporate director of resources, Councillor Darren Grimes, deputy leader, and Councillor Nicola Lyons, cabinet portfolio holder for communities and civic resilience, says:

“At 1 October 2025, the council had approximately 31,200 working age LCTRS claimants, at an estimated annual cost of £41.3mn. The majority of these claimants, 84% [26,208], currently receive 100% support and therefore have no financial stake in or make any contribution to the cost of services provided by the Council.” The pension age scheme, not affected by the changes, costs £24.9mn.

Other North East councils

The move brings Durham closer into line with other councils in the North East, though in recent years there has been a trend among councils nationally towards uncapped rebates. The Durham move will bring in an extra £2.161mn annually, helping to plug the £70mn black hole in the council’s finances described in NEB here.

The LCTRS is a means tested support scheme where an individual’s household, income, capital (savings) and personal circumstances are all taken into account. It is closely aligned to the former Council Tax Benefit system and the existing Housing Benefit system.

Now that claimants are being transferred to Universal Credit, the LCTRS scheme is becoming inefficient and costly to administer. With people’s circumstances sometime changing every month, the annual cost to the council of printing and postage alone is estimated at £175,000.

Durham’s new scheme

Durham is introducing an income banded scheme, which it says is common among councils. A claimant’s entitlement will represent a percentage of their total bill depending on which band their circumstances and income results in them falling into.

The new scheme will also remove the second adult rebate (which offers a 25% council tax reduction under certain conditions if a second adult is living in the property), reduce the limit on the savings a claimant can have from £16,000 to £10,000 and introduce a fixed rate of £10 a week for each non-dependent, regardless of earnings.

South Tyneside, Hartlepool, Stockton and Middlesbrough have income banded schemes. Newcastle, Sunderland and Stockton allow claims up to 100%; other councils in the region impose caps, the tightest being in Darlington, where the maximum rebate is 80%.

What the people think

The decision to revise the LCTRS was taken following a consultation in the summer which attracted 1,856 individual responses. There was 65.8% support for an income banded model. The highest proportion of respondents, 36.2%, favoured setting the cap at 75%, while 30.2% thought it should stay at 100%.

The cabinet decision will go the full council meeting on 10 December for approval.

CLICK HERE TO DONATE TO OUR CROWDFUNDER

HELP US BECOME STRONGER SO THAT WE CAN CONTINUE TO DELIVER POWERFUL CITIZEN JOURNALISM!

Previous Post

Creating real community: new report

Next Post

Sceptred Isle: what Chinese interference says about modern Britain

Peter Morris

Peter Morris

I am a semi-retired journalist with experience in North East newspapers dating back to 1964. I have worked on Tyneside, Wearside and Teesside, specialising in regional politics and local government before moving into newsdesk management. I have also worked in media relations for the government. Since retiring I have studied at university and gained a PhD in economic geography.

Related Posts

Reform UK logo
Opinion

The Reform councillors’ vanishing act

by David Goff
12 September 2026
Gateshead Civic Centre, council handout
Politics

Covert recording memo at Gateshead Council

by Austen Shakespeare
12 September 2026
Ballot box
Northumberland

Candidates confirmed for Northumberland by-election triggered after councillor passed away

by James Robinson
10 September 2026
Iceland waterfall
Politics

Iceland voted No. But what, exactly, did we reject?

by Inga V Henriksen Bergdal
7 September 2026
Daniel Astley, Reform UK councillor for Benwell, Scotswood and Denton Burn, speaking at a Newcastle City Council meeting on 2 September 2026.
Politics

Reform conspiracy theory row in Newcastle

by Daniel Holland
5 September 2026
Next Post
Britain from space

Sceptred Isle: what Chinese interference says about modern Britain

PLEASE SUPPORT OUR CROWDFUNDER

BROWSE BY TAGS

#BenHouchen Ben Houchen Business Co. Durham community Culture Darlington Durham Economy Education entertainment Environment Equality Finance Funding Gateshead Hartlepool Health History Housing Human Rights Local Lockdown Middlesbrough Newcastle North East Northumberland Online safety opinion Peace Politics Redcar Short Story Sunday STDC Stockton Sunderland Technology Teesside Teesworks Transport TVCA Tyneside Ukraine Wearside Which?

We are a not-for-profit citizen journalism publication. Our aim is to publish well-written, fact-based articles and opinion pieces on subjects that are of interest to people in the North East and beyond.

North East Bylines is a trading brand of Bylines Networks Limited which is separate to, but allied with, Byline Times.

Learn more about us

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Authors and editors
  • Complaints
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Letters
  • Privacy
  • Network Map
  • Network RSS Feeds
  • Submission Guidelines
  • Download the Bylines Network App

© 2020-2026 North East Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9763

No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Education
    • Environment
    • UK News
    • Transport
    • World News
  • Opinion
  • Lifestyle
    • Culture
    • Music
    • Poetry
  • Business
    • Economy
    • Technology
    • Trade
  • Audio
  • Authors and editors

Newsletter sign up

CROWDFUNDER

© 2020-2026 North East Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9763