• Contact
  • About
  • ISSN 3049-9763
  • Authors and editors
NEWSLETTER SIGN UP
North East Bylines
Advertisement
  • Home
  • News
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Business
  • Region
  • Opinion
AUDIO
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Business
  • Region
  • Opinion
No Result
View All Result
North East Bylines
Home News Politics

“Elect regional peers” says Newcastle audience

The Jesmond meeting voted by a large majority at the end of Shipley’s talk that the Lords should not be wholly elected, apparently because the audience valued the expertise that some appointed life peers bring to Parliament

Peter Morris by Peter Morris
29-11-2025 09:15
in Politics, Tyneside
Reading Time: 3 mins read
A A
House of Lords

Credit: Copyright House of Lords 2019 / Photography by Roger Harris

Share on Bluesky

Some members of the House of Lords should be directly elected and represent nations and regions of the UK, a hands-up poll of a small Newcastle audience agreed following a talk by Lord Shipley, former Liberal Democrat leader of the City Council.

The Lords currently has 853 members, of whom about 828 are eligible (able to attend) according to the House of Lords Library. The remainder are on leave of absence, disqualified or suspended.

Of those eligible, 713 are life peers, 85 hereditary, 24 bishops and six senior judges. Unlike the current House of Commons, the Conservatives have the largest number, with 283, while Labour have 210 and the Liberal Democrats 75. There are 179 cross-benchers (independents), and 269 eligible members are women. The average age of peers is 71.

Shipley told his audience of a few dozen at Jesmond Library in Newcastle that 15 peers had current home addresses in North East England. He said he was the only eligible member with an address in Newcastle. The UK was an outlier in having no territorial representation in its upper chamber.

Shipley described the Lords as weak in formal powers but strong in persuasive powers and expertise. The House of Lords Appointments Commission did a good job in ensuring any gaps in areas of expertise were filled.

A bill to abolish hereditary peers passed the Commons about a year ago but was amended by the Lords to allow existing hereditaries to remain but not be replaced. The amendment was rejected by the Commons and the bill is expected back in the Lords early next year.

The Brown Commission

The Labour Party set up a Commission in 2020 under the chairmanship of former Prime Minister Gordon Brown to explore constitutional reform, devolution, and ways to rebuild trust in UK governance. When it reported in December 2022 it recommended, among other things, that the “indefensible” House of Lords should be “cleared out” and replaced with a smaller, more representative and democratic second chamber: an Assembly of the Nations and Regions which would ensure that the constitutional limits on government power were obeyed and that power was truly shared with the devolved legislatures and across England.

“The new second chamber should complement the House of Commons with a new role of safeguarding the UK constitution, subject to an agreed procedure that sustains the primacy of the House of Commons”, said the Commission. “The new second chamber must have electoral legitimacy, and should be markedly smaller than the present Lords, chosen on a different electoral cycle – with the precise composition and method of election matters for consultation.”

Backing for territorial peers

The Jesmond meeting voted by a large majority at the end of Shipley’s talk that the Lords should not be wholly elected, apparently because the audience valued the expertise that some appointed life peers bring to Parliament. The precise proportions that should be elected and appointed was barely discussed, but there was an apparently large majority in favour of a territorial link for members of the new chamber. There was no dissent when Shipley said everyone agreed they could not defend hereditary peers any longer.

CLICK HERE TO DONATE TO OUR CROWDFUNDER

HELP US BECOME STRONGER SO THAT WE CAN CONTINUE TO DELIVER POWERFUL CITIZEN JOURNALISM!

Previous Post

Is Labour in real trouble?

Next Post

The devolution solution?

Peter Morris

Peter Morris

I am a semi-retired journalist with experience in North East newspapers dating back to 1964. I have worked on Tyneside, Wearside and Teesside, specialising in regional politics and local government before moving into newsdesk management. I have also worked in media relations for the government. Since retiring I have studied at university and gained a PhD in economic geography.

Related Posts

Reform UK logo
Opinion

The Reform councillors’ vanishing act

by David Goff
12 September 2026
Gateshead Civic Centre, council handout
Politics

Covert recording memo at Gateshead Council

by Austen Shakespeare
12 September 2026
Ballot box
Northumberland

Candidates confirmed for Northumberland by-election triggered after councillor passed away

by James Robinson
10 September 2026
Iceland waterfall
Politics

Iceland voted No. But what, exactly, did we reject?

by Inga V Henriksen Bergdal
7 September 2026
Plans to rebuild Hadrian House in Newcastle city centre as a 21-storey student accommodation block, Corstorphine & Wright Architects via Newcastle City Council
Tyneside

Hadrian House – plans approved

by Daniel Holland
6 September 2026
Next Post
Ben Houchen

The devolution solution?

PLEASE SUPPORT OUR CROWDFUNDER

BROWSE BY TAGS

#BenHouchen Ben Houchen Business Co. Durham community Culture Darlington Durham Economy Education entertainment Environment Equality Finance Funding Gateshead Hartlepool Health History Housing Human Rights Local Lockdown Middlesbrough Newcastle North East Northumberland Online safety opinion Peace Politics Redcar Short Story Sunday STDC Stockton Sunderland Technology Teesside Teesworks Transport TVCA Tyneside Ukraine Wearside Which?

We are a not-for-profit citizen journalism publication. Our aim is to publish well-written, fact-based articles and opinion pieces on subjects that are of interest to people in the North East and beyond.

North East Bylines is a trading brand of Bylines Networks Limited which is separate to, but allied with, Byline Times.

Learn more about us

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Authors and editors
  • Complaints
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Letters
  • Privacy
  • Network Map
  • Network RSS Feeds
  • Submission Guidelines
  • Download the Bylines Network App

© 2020-2026 North East Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9763

No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Education
    • Environment
    • UK News
    • Transport
    • World News
  • Opinion
  • Lifestyle
    • Culture
    • Music
    • Poetry
  • Business
    • Economy
    • Technology
    • Trade
  • Audio
  • Authors and editors

Newsletter sign up

CROWDFUNDER

© 2020-2026 North East Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9763