• Contact
  • About
  • ISSN 3049-9763
  • Authors and editors
NEWSLETTER SIGN UP
North East Bylines
Advertisement
  • Home
  • News
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Business
  • Region
  • Opinion
AUDIO
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Business
  • Region
  • Opinion
No Result
View All Result
North East Bylines
Home Region North East

Inequality and development: from global to local

Inequality is a political choice

Sophie Lively by Sophie Lively
17-08-2022 14:05 - Updated on 31-08-2022 15:23
in North East, Politics
Reading Time: 4 mins read
A A
A sign with the "not equal" symbol is held in a crowd

Photo from shutterstock

Share on Bluesky

Inequality is apparent globally, yet the past 12 years of austerity policies coupled with events such as the Covid-19 pandemic and the current energy crisis, have propelled the notion of inequality within the United Kingdom into everyday discourse. It is now increasingly difficult for those wishing to uphold the long-held neoliberal myth that economic inequality is simply an unfortunate by-product of a necessary and otherwise well-functioning system or, following Thatcherite ideology, that inequality encourages us to just ‘work a little harder’ and that those who are in poverty are there due to their own failings as a way to explain such inequality.

There is growing recognition that decades of policies aimed at increasing growth at all costs could, in part, be to blame for the rise of within-country inequality. Whilst the Covid-19 pandemic put a halt to traditional development practice, much research emphasised the global progress being made over the past quarter of a century in terms of extreme poverty reduction. Such claims are generally founded on traditional quantitative research which places emphasis on measurements such as gross domestic product (GDP) and the Gini coefficient as indicators of ‘progress’. But through understanding criticisms of income growth as a way out of poverty, development strategies based on infinite growth, technological advancement, and investment – both through aid and charity, become less convincing.

Income growth is only one element in a vast picture resulting in inequality and crucially it ignores the finite resources we have globally which are being stretched beyond the point of repair. The ever-increasing interconnections penetrating all our lives, as a result of globalisation, are felt acutely as both causes and consequences of such stark inequality. As such, the result is that global challenges are littered with geo-political tension as leaders globally vie for their own wants, risking collaboration crucial to addressing global issues. Such a landscape has resulted in it being increasingly difficult for countries to ‘develop’, in the traditional sense, due to having little to no control over global factors which have direct impacts on progress. Such an approach also discounts individual freedom and agency.

Gap between haves and have-nots

The gap between the haves and the have-nots has widened at an unrivalled speed. Inequality transcends borders and this plays out on the macro scale through historical colonial relations which continue to blight much of the global south, through to the meso and micro level where here, in the North East of England, many are set to experience one of the toughest winters in a generation. Figures show that around 6.5 million UK households are in the grip of fuel poverty and coupled with the energy crisis is food poverty. In 2021–2022, the Trussell Trust distributed over 2.1 million food parcels and this does not take into account all of the wonderful grassroots food banks and organisations supporting local communities. Alongside this are the recent damning statistics that the North East has overtaken London and now has the highest rate of child poverty of anywhere in the country.

Inequality is a political choice

Whilst praise should be given where gains have been made with regards to inequality, it is important to remember that it is not a natural phenomenon and instead is a political choice. As Dorling (2019) highlights in Inequality and the 1%:

“As inequalities increase, people already at the top become ever more motivated solely by greed. The source of inequality is a failure to control the greedy”.

Thus, it is imperative we pursue alternatives that effectively address economic inequality, gender inequality, healthcare, and the climate crisis, whilst working towards the reshaping and redistribution of power.

As the rich get richer the rest of us are being left behind. Left behind in increasingly tumultuous and turbulent times. We would do well to remember that despite vacuous mainstream rhetoric claiming immigrants, benefits scroungers or single mothers are the real drain on society limiting resources and spending ‘our cash’, it is instead unrivalled, unchallenged and limitless wealth in the hands of a few which is both driving and sustaining inequality.

Previous Post

A sustainable policy for Tyneside taxis

Next Post

The Tories’ climate change policy does not add up

Sophie Lively

Sophie Lively

Sophie Lively is a postgraduate student studying Global Development with an interest in socio-economic security, politics and local identities.

Related Posts

ballot box and US flags
Opinion

Trump will destroy democracy in America

by Mark Brown
11 October 2026
Dunedin House, Stockton Council's headquarters on Columbia Drive, Thornaby.
Business

Stockton Council handed out over £17mn worth of contracts without following its own rules

by Gareth Lightfoot
11 October 2026
Andy Burnham PM office
Opinion

Burnham has said the unsayable on Brexit. What happens now?

by Benjamin Martill
11 October 2026
Andy Burnham
European News

A no-brainer for Burnham?

by North East Bylines
10 October 2026
voting
Opinion

Holborn and St Pancras by-election

by Jamie Driscoll
9 October 2026
Next Post
Flood in York in 2022. Climate change brings about more floods and not just heatwaves and wildfires

The Tories’ climate change policy does not add up

PLEASE SUPPORT OUR CROWDFUNDER

BROWSE BY TAGS

#BenHouchen Ben Houchen Business Co. Durham community Culture Darlington Durham Economy Education entertainment Environment Equality Finance Funding Gateshead Hartlepool Health History Housing Human Rights Investment Local Lockdown Middlesbrough Newcastle North East Northumberland Online safety opinion Peace Politics Redcar STDC Stockton Sunderland Technology Teesside Teesworks Transport TVCA Tyneside Ukraine Wearside Which?

We are a not-for-profit citizen journalism publication. Our aim is to publish well-written, fact-based articles and opinion pieces on subjects that are of interest to people in the North East and beyond.

North East Bylines is a trading brand of Bylines Networks Limited which is separate to, but allied with, Byline Times.

Learn more about us

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Authors and editors
  • Complaints
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Letters
  • Privacy
  • Network Map
  • Network RSS Feeds
  • Submission Guidelines
  • Download the Bylines Network App

© 2020-2026 North East Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9763

No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Education
    • Environment
    • UK News
    • Transport
    • World News
  • Opinion
  • Lifestyle
    • Culture
    • Music
    • Poetry
  • Business
    • Economy
    • Technology
    • Trade
  • Audio
  • Authors and editors

Newsletter sign up

CROWDFUNDER

© 2020-2026 North East Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9763