• Contact
  • About
  • ISSN 3049-9763
  • Authors and editors
NEWSLETTER SIGN UP
North East Bylines
Advertisement
  • Home
  • News
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Business
  • Region
  • Opinion
AUDIO
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Business
  • Region
  • Opinion
No Result
View All Result
North East Bylines
Home Region Co. Durham

Reform cabinet backs £10mn cuts to start filling Durham’s growing black hole

Reform is now learning that running a big council is not as easy as it probably thought

Peter Morris by Peter Morris
20-11-2025 10:00
in Co. Durham, Politics
Reading Time: 5 mins read
A A
County Durham sign

Photo by StrippedPixel.com/Shutterstock.com

Share on Bluesky

The black hole in Durham County Council’s budget has grown by £11.1mn in the past two months under the control of Reform UK, and its cabinet has been forced to approve a £10mn list of proposed cuts, including in staff numbers, and increases in charges.

But the measures will still leave the county council with a deficit of £72mn over the coming four years unless councillors agree more cuts or council tax increases or use of reserves or a combination of the three. Without the £10m cuts now being proposed the four-year deficit would be £82.1mn.

The council says it is under pressure from inflation and the cost of children’s social care, school transport, homelessness and special educational needs and disability in particular.

Councillor Darren Grimes, deputy leader of the council, said at a meeting of the cabinet during discussion of the four-year Medium-Term Financial Plan (MTFP) that the figures were depressing and “no joke”.

Durham’s cabinet was presented with figures in September, as reported by NEB at the time, revealing a black hole of £71mn by the end of the MTFP if cuts were not made, council tax not raised and reserves not used. This week’s cabinet meeting approved £10mn cuts – for consultation, but in substance almost certain to go ahead – but they have already been swallowed up by more cost rises.

The proposed savings, which will be spread over the MTFP period are in addition to £5.6mn approved by the former Liberal Democrat-led council in February. £9.1mn of the new savings will come in 2026-27.

Even with the new savings, warns a report by Councillor Grimes and Paul Darby, corporate director of resources, a significant budget deficit remains: “Cabinet will therefore carefully need to consider options to raise council tax, find further financial savings and/or consider the use of reserves as a temporary measure to help balance the budget next year.” The council has £34.5mn reserves, but councillors have been warned that authorities that have placed an over-reliance on reserves and avoided making difficult choices around savings and council tax have gotten (sic) themselves very quickly into financial distress.

An annual council tax rise of 2% earmarked for social care or 3% in the core council tax would still require savings of  £34.8mn or £47.4mn, equivalent to staff cuts of 900 or 1,200 respectively. Even with a full 5% rise there would be a deficit of £10.6mn over the MTFP period.

According to a cabinet report by Darby and Grimes: “Options to increase council tax must be given serious consideration, and particularly the option to increase council tax by the maximum 5% per annum. Even with this level of increase, it will be important to consider and develop a further suite of transformational savings and additional budget savings to help balance the budget across the coming years.”

The cuts and charges

The savings agreed for consultation by the cabinet this week (November 19) will affect virtually every council service and all sections of the population. They include the loss of 88 full-time equivalent (FTE) posts, about one-third of which are currently vacant. Overall, the largest savings are in neighbourhoods and environment services (£3.4mn), health and adult services (£2.6mn), resources (mostly staffing) (£1.6mn) and regeneration, economy and growth (£1mn).

Among specific savings: increased parking charges will bring in £525,000 in Durham City and towns around the county and a 40% rise in resident and visitor parking permits will bring in £40,000. School crossing patrols (hard to fill anyway, says the council) will be reduced, saving £80,000. Pensioners will have to pay £1 instead of 50p to travel before 9.30am, to be phased in over two years. Bus routes 35A and 104, said to be under-used and unviable, will be withdrawn, saving £84,000 in 2026/27 and £117,000 in 2027/.28. Utilities will be charged for carrying our roadworks on busy routes, bringing in £310,000 next year.

The culture, sport and tourism services will be restructured, axing 4.5 FTE jobs and saving £225,000. Business Durham will increase its rents on commercial properties, raising £250,000 over four years.

Funding for the Care Connect service, which provides emergency home alarm and telecare services to around 10,000 clients is to be “realigned”, saving £400,000, pending a review. A vacant managerial post in building safety and housing standards will be axed, saving £43,000. Business support will be cut by £634,000, losing 18.7 FTE staff. Axing grants to town and parish councils will save £750,000.

The frequency of spraying weeds on footpaths across the county will be reduced, saving £121,000. A reduction in summer bedding will save £50,000, grass cutting £96,000, litter picking £193,000, parks and countryside staff, saving £44,000, and playground inspections £17,000. Crematorium charges will be increased, raising £88,000.

Comment

Councillor Grimes is not wrong to blame underfunding and cost pressures beyond the council’s control, such as children’s social care, for Durham’s financial predicament. The North East’s Labour councils have been saying the same thing for years. Reform is now learning that running a big council is not as easy as it probably thought.

*The full list of proposed savings can be found in Appendix 3 of the cabinet report here.

CLICK HERE TO SUPPORT THE BYLINES NETWORK CROWDFUNDER!

Previous Post

Mass “show of support” this Sunday for art space plans by Sir Antony Gormley in Hexham

Next Post

Sunderland: councillors to vote on supported accommodation plan for homeless people

Peter Morris

Peter Morris

I am a semi-retired journalist with experience in North East newspapers dating back to 1964. I have worked on Tyneside, Wearside and Teesside, specialising in regional politics and local government before moving into newsdesk management. I have also worked in media relations for the government. Since retiring I have studied at university and gained a PhD in economic geography.

Related Posts

Ballot box
Northumberland

Candidates confirmed for Northumberland by-election triggered after councillor passed away

by James Robinson
10 September 2026
Iceland waterfall
Politics

Iceland voted No. But what, exactly, did we reject?

by Inga V Henriksen Bergdal
7 September 2026
Daniel Astley, Reform UK councillor for Benwell, Scotswood and Denton Burn, speaking at a Newcastle City Council meeting on 2 September 2026.
Politics

Reform conspiracy theory row in Newcastle

by Daniel Holland
5 September 2026
Durham city
Co. Durham

Former County Durham Reform councillor joins a new party

by Peter Sagar
4 September 2026
Newcastle Civic Centre council chamber, CC 2.0
Politics

The future of local government

by Mark Corner
3 September 2026
Next Post
Sunderland City Council proposes supported accommodation for homeless people at property in The Elms West, Sunderland. Credit: Google Maps

Sunderland: councillors to vote on supported accommodation plan for homeless people

PLEASE SUPPORT OUR CROWDFUNDER

BROWSE BY TAGS

#BenHouchen Ben Houchen Business Co. Durham community Culture Darlington Durham Economy Education entertainment Environment Equality Finance Funding Gateshead Hartlepool Health History Housing Human Rights Local Lockdown Middlesbrough Newcastle North East Northumberland Online safety opinion Peace Politics Redcar Short Story Sunday STDC Stockton Sunderland Technology Teesside Teesworks Transport TVCA Tyneside Ukraine Wearside Which?

We are a not-for-profit citizen journalism publication. Our aim is to publish well-written, fact-based articles and opinion pieces on subjects that are of interest to people in the North East and beyond.

North East Bylines is a trading brand of Bylines Networks Limited which is separate to, but allied with, Byline Times.

Learn more about us

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Authors and editors
  • Complaints
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Letters
  • Privacy
  • Network Map
  • Network RSS Feeds
  • Submission Guidelines
  • Download the Bylines Network App

© 2020-2026 North East Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9763

No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Education
    • Environment
    • UK News
    • Transport
    • World News
  • Opinion
  • Lifestyle
    • Culture
    • Music
    • Poetry
  • Business
    • Economy
    • Technology
    • Trade
  • Audio
  • Authors and editors

Newsletter sign up

CROWDFUNDER

© 2020-2026 North East Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9763