• Contact
  • About
  • ISSN 3049-9763
  • Authors and editors
NEWSLETTER SIGN UP
North East Bylines
Advertisement
  • Home
  • News
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Business
  • Region
  • Opinion
AUDIO
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Business
  • Region
  • Opinion
No Result
View All Result
North East Bylines
Home News Politics

Why Houchen blocked the Live Well Centre in Middlesbrough town centre: the real reason

Why did Ben Houchen refuse the plan for the Live Well Centre?

Julia Mazza by Julia Mazza
30-05-2024 07:00
in Politics, Teesside
Reading Time: 5 mins read
A A
Ben Houchen

image by PjrNews. Alamy Stock Photo

Share on Bluesky

More information emerges about Mayor Ben Houchen’s veto on a planning application for the Live Well Centre. The plan is for the health facility to move from Dundas Arcade to two units at the Cleveland Centre a few minutes’ walk away.

The changes to the two units require planning permission and as the Cleveland Centre is within the boundaries of Middlesbrough Development Corporation (MDC) and the council is the applicant, the application must seek approval from the MDC planning board, chaired by Houchen.

Tory Houchen refused the plan at the MDC planning board meeting on Friday 24 May, aided by his ally Steve Turner, Tory former Police and Crime Commissioner. Houchen then used his casting vote to sink the centre’s application.

The official reason

Why would Houchen do this? Let’s take his official version first.

Houchen cited “real and perceived issues” of criminality. He presented the Live Well Centre as an addiction service which would attract people prepared to commit crimes to fund their habit.

In fact, the Live Well Centre is not a drug and alcohol centre. They merely employ staff in case anyone turns up in crisis or to support young or exploited young people.  It is a one stop shop for multiple health issues, reducing NHS costs to provide a vast range of services including diabetes management.

They were the first community facility to offer Long Covid treatment after the pandemic.

Houchen claimed that people have told him they are frightened to go into the town centre. If we are to believe him, there are scientific reasons for this: the major one being the empty shops. 

The police comment on the application (which it did not oppose) mentions their Secured By Design guidelines. These are based on environmental psychology principles: that criminality can be triggered by the brain stem given a few environmental conditions, two of which are: evidence of desertion and a lack of surveillance.

Empty shops are a sign of desertion. The units that Live Well want to move to have been empty for 14 years. 

Increased pedestrian traffic provides not only footfall for retailers but also passive surveillance, reducing the possibility of crime.

So the centre would deter crime.

Houchen also claimed that the change of use would erode retail occupation – by 2%, despite the CEO Clive Heaphy arguing for more flexibility in considering planning applications. Like every other town centre, Middlesbrough isn’t short of empty shops.

The real reason

So, what is the real reason for Houchen’s veto? It boils down to his relationship with the Conservative government.

Live Well’s move to the Cleveland Centre is funded with a £4mn grant from central government’s Levelling Up Partnership funds. An employment hub for the Cleveland Centre is to receive £1.25mn.

The grant, announced in February this year, comes from the Department of Levelling Up, Housing and Communities. It is being managed through Middlesbrough Council and not from Houchen’s Tees Valley Combined Authority (TVCA).  In the press releases about the Levelling Up Partnership money, Houchen was not mentioned. At the time he was under a cloud while Michael Gove’s review of the TVCA was being conducted and Gove was trying to distance himself from him.

But times have changed. Following his re-election Houchen is again the Golden Boy, and Gove leaves parliament at the general election next month. The planning rejection is the chest-beating of a triumphant silver back gorilla.

What happens next?

The grant for the move has a deadline of 31 March 2025, although the council is allowed to defray costs with their capital financing. The grant is also specific to the itemised project.

So, is this the end of the Live Well expansion? Its current lease at the Dundas Arcade expires in December.

What will happen to over £5mn in grants? Will it find its way onto Lord Houchen’s desk?

The real reasons for Houchen’s veto could explain the secretive nature of the planning board meeting, after two postponements.  Allegations are flying that applicant officials were not invited to speak; the doors were locked; and no official minutes were taken.

Houchen doesn’t normally need to use his casting vote on the MDC Planning Board, he can rely on faithful Conservative Councillor Mieka Smiles. She was absent from last Friday’s meeting as she was on a cruise (she’s a travel writer for the Mail).

CLICK HERE TO DONATE TO OUR CROWDFUNDER

HELP US BECOME STRONGER SO THAT WE CAN CONTINUE TO DELIVER POWERFUL CITIZEN JOURNALISM!

Previous Post

Disinformation in the election campaigns

Next Post

Young people want Europe on the election agenda

Julia Mazza

Julia Mazza

Julia Mazza grew up in Middlesbrough, the descendant of Irish Famine refugee ironworkers and a Tyne shipyard union organiser. She is in awe of how the North East industrial workers, enduring intense hardship, still managed to create a formidable labour movement. Retired after a career in campaigns and commercial and policy research, she now lives in London

Related Posts

Edge of Skerningham Woods, photo by Ray Casey
Housing

Darlington Northern Link Road: (Part 6: Skerningham Garden Village property moguls go nuclear)

by Peter Greenwood and Ray Casey
16 October 2026
The headquarters of the Tees Valley Combined Authority, which is based at Teesside Airport. Picture/credit: Tees Valley Combined Authority.
Politics

Ministers warn Houchen not to destroy documents pending Best Value inspection

by Peter Morris
16 October 2026
Home Office building, photo by Steve Cadman, Flickr,, CC 2.0
Politics

Best Value Inspection confirmed over concerns and questions at TVCA

by Peter Morris
16 October 2026
Gaza - Palestine Gaza residents inspect their destroyed homes
Equality

Life in Gaza after 12 months of ‘ceasefire’

by Anne Irfan
16 October 2026
UAE Flag
Politics

How Reform UK is closely linked to the United Arab Emirates

by Peter Sagar
16 October 2026
Next Post
Young people with EU flags

Young people want Europe on the election agenda

PLEASE SUPPORT OUR CROWDFUNDER

BROWSE BY TAGS

#BenHouchen Ben Houchen Business Co. Durham community Culture Darlington Durham Economy Education entertainment Environment Equality Finance Funding Gateshead Hartlepool Health History Housing Human Rights Investment Local Lockdown Middlesbrough Newcastle North East Northumberland Online safety opinion Peace Politics Redcar STDC Stockton Sunderland Technology Teesside Teesworks Transport TVCA Tyneside Ukraine Wearside Which?

We are a not-for-profit citizen journalism publication. Our aim is to publish well-written, fact-based articles and opinion pieces on subjects that are of interest to people in the North East and beyond.

North East Bylines is a trading brand of Bylines Networks Limited which is separate to, but allied with, Byline Times.

Learn more about us

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Authors and editors
  • Complaints
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Letters
  • Privacy
  • Network Map
  • Network RSS Feeds
  • Submission Guidelines
  • Download the Bylines Network App

© 2020-2026 North East Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9763

No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Education
    • Environment
    • UK News
    • Transport
    • World News
  • Opinion
  • Lifestyle
    • Culture
    • Music
    • Poetry
  • Business
    • Economy
    • Technology
    • Trade
  • Audio
  • Authors and editors

Newsletter sign up

CROWDFUNDER

© 2020-2026 North East Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9763