• Contact
  • About
  • ISSN 3049-9763
  • Authors and editors
NEWSLETTER SIGN UP
North East Bylines
Advertisement
  • Home
  • News
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Business
  • Region
  • Opinion
AUDIO
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Business
  • Region
  • Opinion
No Result
View All Result
North East Bylines
Home News Transport

Gateshead: Flyover ‘gone within a year’

Gateshead Flyover will be 'gone within a year', council leader promises

Daniel Holland by Daniel Holland
18-03-2025 18:00
in Transport, Travel
Reading Time: 4 mins read
A A
The closed Gateshead Flyover, where defective pillars have been encased in new concrete. Photo: Gateshead Council.

The closed Gateshead Flyover, where defective pillars have been encased in new concrete. Photo: Gateshead Council.

Share on Bluesky

The Gateshead Flyover will be “gone within a year”, the town’s Labour leader has promised.

Gateshead Council’s cabinet agreed on Tuesday morning to have the A167 Gateshead Highway flyover pulled down, with the 1960s concrete structure having been closed for the last three months due to fears that it could be at risk of collapse.

The exact timescales for its demolition, the method of removal, the cost of doing so, and who will fund it remain unclear, though the local authority has made provisions to spend up to £18 million on it if required.

However, council leader Martin Gannon told the Local Democracy Reporting Service (LDRS) that the flyover “will be gone within a year, for definite”.

Coun Gannon said there was an “absolute determination to demolish it as rapidly as possible”, with council sources indicating that the removal should be completed in the next 12 months – but potentially even before the end of 2025.

Demolition Funding

At Tuesday morning’s civic centre meeting, cabinet member John Adams said the Government should not be “allowed to wriggle off this hook” and insisted that ministers had a responsibility to step in with money to help the council pay for the demolition.

He added that, given the hundreds of millions spent on upgrades to the A1 through Gateshead, the “surely they can have a look at their budget and find money to help us bring down the flyover”.

North East mayor Kim McGuinness has also offered to help pay for the flyover’s removal, though no contribution from the North East Combined Authority (NECA) has been signed off as yet.

The council has already spent more than £1 million on emergency repairs since the flyover’s closure in mid-December, with work completed last week to encase two of its pillars in new concrete.

Civic centre leaders hope that the demolition of the flyover will be the catalyst for a wider regeneration of the area.

Plans to knock it down and open a tree-lined boulevard in its place have been touted since 2008, but have never been funded.

Labour councillor John McElroy warned on Tuesday, however, that the flyover will be “terribly difficult to actually demolish”.

Coun Gannon told the LDRS that the essential infrastructure beneath the flyover, most notably the underground Tyne and Wear Metro lines, mean it cannot simply be blown up.

He revealed that talks have been held about sections of the elevated highway being  lifted off in sections and broken down on another site, like neighbouring land on the old Chandless Estate, but that might not be feasible due to the weight of the structure.

Coun Gannon added: “It is not that simple, it is an incredibly heavy and really complex piece of infrastructure which needs to be carefully managed. I am confident that will happen.”

He also pledged that the demolition would go ahead regardless of whether the council received any financial help, saying: “If we can get a contribution from the Government or NECA towards those costs that reduces the liability on Gateshead in terms of strain on the ongoing capital programme, however it is not dependent on those contributions. It is going to have to happen. Whatever the implications, it is a priority and we will have to do it.”

CLICK HERE TO DONATE TO OUR CROWDFUNDER

HELP US BECOME STRONGER SO THAT WE CAN CONTINUE TO DELIVER POWERFUL CITIZEN JOURNALISM!

Tags: City InfrastructureGatesheadLocalSecurityTransport
Previous Post

The wages of death: Newcastle’s infamous railway crime

Next Post

Middlesbrough: Affordable homes scheme knocked on the head as bungalows feature in new plan for vacant plot

Daniel Holland

Daniel Holland

Daniel Holland is a Local Democracy Reporter

Related Posts

Redcar Bus Depot
Community

While Ben Houchen beats the airport drum, Teessiders are still stuck at the bus stop

by James Waterson
16 September 2026
Victoria Viaduct, photo by Ray Casey
Transport

The Tyne & Wear Metro is coming to Washington: here’s a preview

by Ray Casey
13 September 2026
A train decked out in the new GBR livery. Credit: UK Government
Transport

New trains for Middlesbrough

by Daniel Hodgson
13 September 2026
David Milligan
Northumberland

A former hospital consultant now paralysed from the neck down in an A1 crash says dualling the road is only half the job

by Andy Cooper
11 September 2026
traffic light
Transport

Red light means danger

by Mark Bell
1 September 2026
Next Post
Cllr David Coupe who represents Stainton and Thornton Credit: Terry Blackburn / Teesside Live.

Middlesbrough: Affordable homes scheme knocked on the head as bungalows feature in new plan for vacant plot

PLEASE SUPPORT OUR CROWDFUNDER

BROWSE BY TAGS

#BenHouchen Ben Houchen Business Co. Durham community Culture Darlington Durham Economy Education entertainment Environment Equality Finance Funding Gateshead Hartlepool Health History Housing Human Rights Local Lockdown Middlesbrough Newcastle North East Northumberland Online safety opinion Peace Politics Redcar Short Story Sunday STDC Stockton Sunderland Technology Teesside Teesworks Transport TVCA Tyneside Ukraine Wearside Which?

We are a not-for-profit citizen journalism publication. Our aim is to publish well-written, fact-based articles and opinion pieces on subjects that are of interest to people in the North East and beyond.

North East Bylines is a trading brand of Bylines Networks Limited which is separate to, but allied with, Byline Times.

Learn more about us

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Authors and editors
  • Complaints
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Letters
  • Privacy
  • Network Map
  • Network RSS Feeds
  • Submission Guidelines
  • Download the Bylines Network App

© 2020-2026 North East Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9763

No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Education
    • Environment
    • UK News
    • Transport
    • World News
  • Opinion
  • Lifestyle
    • Culture
    • Music
    • Poetry
  • Business
    • Economy
    • Technology
    • Trade
  • Audio
  • Authors and editors

Newsletter sign up

CROWDFUNDER

© 2020-2026 North East Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9763