• Contact
  • About
  • ISSN 3049-9763
  • Authors and editors
NEWSLETTER SIGN UP
North East Bylines
Advertisement
  • Home
  • News
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Business
  • Region
  • Opinion
AUDIO
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Business
  • Region
  • Opinion
No Result
View All Result
North East Bylines
Home Business Economy

NIH funding cuts: a threat to medical research?

The NIH funding cuts appear as a threat to research institutions and universities across the US.

Bach Ngoc Hieu by Bach Ngoc Hieu
26-02-2025 15:30
in Economy, World News
Reading Time: 4 mins read
A A
Photo by Hush Naidoo Jade Photography on Unsplash

Photo by Hush Naidoo Jade Photography on Unsplash

Share on Bluesky

NIH funding refers to the budget, annually provided by the National Institute of Health (NIH), located in the US, to support medical and biomedical research. According to NIH, it invests more than $48 billion annually in medical research in order to seek solutions that help people live longer and healthier. In general, NIH – funded research has achieved breakthroughs as well as new treatments, helping lots of people’s lives.

Budget cuts

Where do these funding cuts come from? They all come from the Trump administration, which leads to the notice of updated policy released by the NIH on February 7th. It mentions that the imposed cuts would limit the “indirect costs” ( facilities, administration, maintenance cost, etc) from the NIH to 15%, which was far lower than the previous budget, ranging from 28% to 60%. This news is shocking to research institutions and universities in the US, putting them in a complete state of terror. 

What does it mean for research institutes and universities?

So, having received the notice, what are the reactions? Fear (of losing research prospects) and shock ( of what is truly happening in front of their eyes), of course. When they got the notice firsthand, they didn’t accept the fact that the NIH funding was actually limited to 15%.In an article by NBC, they quote Rick Huganir, a neuroscientist at John Hopkins University emailing his friend, who got the NIH notice, in disbelief: “Am I reading this right, 15%?” and then worried that this could have a devastating impact on years of research. In another case, The Guardian quotes Neil Rudestine, a former president at Harvard University and provost at Yale University. “It’s a devastating proposal. It would be a totally disastrous thing if it actually happens”. 

Their reactions varied, but they all worry about one common thing: the future of medical research. Obviously, lowering the funding means decreasing job opportunities and devastation of the research field. The chances for both national and international students are becoming less and less competitive due to the inability of research experience provision coming from restricted budgets for financial research projects. Specifically, in the research field, the NIH funding cuts can lead to numerous consequences, as AAMC president and CEO Dr. David J. Skorton and Chief Scientific Officer Dr. Elena Fuentes-Afflick said in a joint statement: “Slower scientific progress, longer waits for cures, fewer jobs.” In other words, the progress of this field will be affected, struggling to produce new cures and treatments for everyone. Additionally, less employees means more workloads, which is a tricky task for the remaining employees. 

Effort To Halt 

After the notice of NIH’s funding cuts was updated, there were massive and rapid responses to this notice. On February 10th, In the midst of the chaos, states and research institutions browsed for lawsuits within the updated policy on a temporary hold. These lawsuits were filed by 22 state attorney generals, the Association of American Universities and the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC). There was a small detail in the lawsuit that concerns AAU. “Smaller institutions will not be able to sustain any research at all and could close entirely”. 

As a result, on the same day, the effort to cease the cuts was reciprocated.   A judge from the US District Court of Massachusetts granted a Temporary Restriction Order (TRO) on the cases of the state attorneys and AAMC. Until now, the Federal Court is continuing to block NIH funding cuts, helping research institutions and universities get over their problems. 

The tide has not settled yet

At the moment, all the research institutions and universities are still safe from the threat of the NIH’s funding cuts thanks to the Federal Court. However, will they be safe in the next following weeks? The answer lies in how they choose to respond to this “financial burden”. As the 47th President of the United States Donald Trump takes the lead, the future ahead is still covered with lots of uncertainties and surprises.

CLICK HERE TO DONATE TO OUR CROWDFUNDER

HELP US BECOME STRONGER SO THAT WE CAN CONTINUE TO DELIVER POWERFUL CITIZEN JOURNALISM!

Tags: Budget cutsFinanceMedicineNIHWorld News
Previous Post

Newcastle Hospital boss takes top NHS job

Next Post

Britain has to stand for Ukraine

Bach Ngoc Hieu

Bach Ngoc Hieu

Bach Ngoc Hieu lives in Ha Noi, Vietnam, where he's partway through a degree in international relations and works as an English tutor and teaching assistant. He loves researching and writing about social, academic or educational matters

Related Posts

Standing Together vigil. Newcastle, photo by Peter Sagar
World News

Standing together to protect Palestinians in the West Bank

by Peter Sagar
25 August 2026
Boy standing among rubble, holding a cardboard sign that reads, 'Help me complete my education like other children around the world' (Gaza).
Education

Nabil’s dream: the chance to go to school

by Jennie Kermode
16 August 2026
Ceuta, Spanish city in North Africa, seen from Morocco behind a thorn wire fence located on the Moroccan border,
World News

How the Ceuta border crossing incident immediately played into the hands of Spain’s far right

by Deniz Torcu
5 August 2026
Saudi Arabia flag. Human rights
World News

Life in Saudi Arabia: Part 35 July 2026

by Peter Sagar
5 August 2026
Submarine surfacing in the open sea, with waves splashing around the hull and the conning tower visible.
Economy

Nuclear deterrence means apprenticeships, says Burnham

by Peter Morris
31 July 2026
Next Post
union jack

Britain has to stand for Ukraine

PLEASE SUPPORT OUR CROWDFUNDER

BROWSE BY TAGS

#BenHouchen Ben Houchen Business Co. Durham community Culture Darlington Durham Economy Education entertainment Environment Equality Finance Funding Gateshead Hartlepool Health History Housing Human Rights Local Lockdown Middlesbrough Newcastle North East Northumberland Online safety opinion Peace Politics Redcar Short Story Sunday STDC Stockton Sunderland Technology Teesside Teesworks Transport TVCA Tyneside Ukraine Wearside Which?

We are a not-for-profit citizen journalism publication. Our aim is to publish well-written, fact-based articles and opinion pieces on subjects that are of interest to people in the North East and beyond.

North East Bylines is a trading brand of Bylines Networks Limited which is separate to, but allied with, Byline Times.

Learn more about us

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Authors and editors
  • Complaints
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Letters
  • Privacy
  • Network Map
  • Network RSS Feeds
  • Submission Guidelines
  • Download the Bylines Network App

© 2020-2026 North East Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9763

No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Education
    • Environment
    • UK News
    • Transport
    • World News
  • Opinion
  • Lifestyle
    • Culture
    • Music
    • Poetry
  • Business
    • Economy
    • Technology
    • Trade
  • Audio
  • Authors and editors

Newsletter sign up

CROWDFUNDER

© 2020-2026 North East Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9763