• Contact
  • About
DONATE
NEWSLETTER SIGN UP
  • Login
North East Bylines
  • Home
  • News
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Business
  • Region
  • Opinion
AUDIO
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Business
  • Region
  • Opinion
No Result
View All Result
North East Bylines
Home News Brexit

No deal or a bad deal?

Johnson has effectively torn up this agreement - his agreement - causing consternation across Europe and in British industry and agriculture.

Richard CorbettbyRichard Corbett
20-10-2020 12:02 - Updated On 20-05-2023 17:31
in Brexit, Business, Economy, Politics, UK
Reading Time: 4 mins
A A
Photo of protestor holding a placard..

Photo by North East Bylines

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

While the problems of a No Deal outcome to the UK-EU negotiations have been well rehearsed, it’s perfectly possible that Johnson’s strategy is to get a minimalist deal and hope that everyone sighs with relief that he has got  some kind of deal.

But a minimalist deal would be a bad deal. Anything that reduces our access to the single market for our exports and our supply chains (including for food and medicine), to Europol and police co-operation, to EU research programmes (especially medical research), to cross-border road haulage permits, to the EHIC health insurance card for travellers, to the ERASMUS student exchange scheme, and to much else, would be damaging to Britain, destroying jobs, reducing security, and inflicting red tape and bureaucracy on businesses and citizens alike. 

Johnson claims that he is relaxed about an Australia type deal with the EU.  But the EU has no Free Trade Agreement with Australia (talks about one have just got underway), so he may equally say a Mongolia type deal or an Afghanistan type deal – they too have no full trade deal with the EU.  But he thinks Australia sounds good, so he says that rather than No Deal.

He claims his preference is for a Canada type deal (it does have a deal with the EU) and he blames the EU for not giving him that. Truth is, in the actual negotiations, what Britain asked for went well beyond what Canada has, demanding tariff free access to the EU market for ALL British goods and services, mutual recognition of professional qualifications, the right of citizens to work in each others’ markets for short periods, the right for British firms to compete for all government contracts across EU countries, British lorries to have unlimited rights to roam around the EU, not to mention the non-economic issues such as access to police data. All of that is more than Canada.

For its part, the EU is wary of allowing British firms to compete in the EU market without following the same standards as everyone else as regards consumer protection, health & safety, unfair subsidies, environmental protection and workers’ rights.  The UK is still highly integrated into the European economy, and the prospect of British firms competing on the basis of lower standards than others is not acceptable to them in their market.

The EU points out that the UK actually agreed to a level playing field when the government negotiated, signed and ratified the Withdrawal Agreement in January. The Political Declaration attached to the Agreement, that set out the basis both sides agreed for the future relationship, spelled out that “the future relationship must ensure open and fair competition, encompassing robust commitments to ensure a level playing field” and “the Parties should uphold the common high standards (…) in the areas of state aid, competition, social and employment standards, environment, climate change, and relevant tax matters (…) and maintain environmental, social and employment standards at the current high levels”. 

Johnson has effectively torn up this agreement – his agreement – causing consternation across Europe and in British industry and agriculture. This consternation was amplified when he introduced the Internal Market Bill, which the government itself admits would break international law by giving ministers the right to overrule the Northern Ireland protocol, the part of the Withdrawal Agreement designed to safeguard the Good Friday Agreement and avoid a hard border in Ireland.  

Of course, there are many on the right wing of the Conservative party who actually want to leave without a deal, despite the huge economic costs (which they hope will be less visible because of the Covid19 crisis).  They think any deal will, to at least some degree, keep Britain aligned with high European standards on food safety, consumer protection, the environment and workers’ rights. The very reason they wanted Brexit in the first place is to tear up these standards and create a free-for-all market in which big corporations are freed from these obligations and are not liable for the damage they cause. They want Britain to re-align away from its neighbours to the USA, both economically and politically.

Johnson became Conservative leader and therefore Prime Minister by appeasing this wing of the Tory party.  He is unlikely to change course.  The only uncertainty is whether there will be no deal or a bad deal.

Previous Post

Soaring youth employment in the UK: now is the time to find a NEET solution

Next Post

Boris Johnson has failed to protect lives and the economy

Richard Corbett

Richard Corbett

Richard Corbett was MEP for Yorkshire & Humber. He was first elected to the European Parliament in 1996. From 2017 to 2020 he was Leader of the Labour MEPs and a member of the Labour Party's National Executive Committee. He has written extensively on European affairs, including co-authoring several university textbooks.

Related Posts

Gaza Oct 23
Opinion

Gaza’s statistics of death

byDavid Keys
December 7, 2023
hands holding candle
Community

75 years since Universal Declaration of Human Rights: celebration at Sunderland Minster

byNorth East Bylines
December 6, 2023
Margaret Thatcher
North East

In praise of Thatcher: has Starmer gone too far?

byJulia Mazza
December 5, 2023
Two young women holding hands in demonstration
Politics

Human Rights Day

byPeter Sagar
December 5, 2023
Margaret Thatcher
North East

Keir Starmer’s praise of Margaret Thatcher

byChris Wade
December 4, 2023
Next Post
Boris Johnson

Boris Johnson has failed to protect lives and the economy

PLEASE SUPPORT OUR CROWDFUNDER

Subscribe to our newsletters
CHOOSE YOUR NEWS
Follow us on social media
CHOOSE YOUR PLATFORMS
Download our app
ALL OF BYLINES IN ONE PLACE
Subscribe to our gazette
CONTRIBUTE TO OUR SUSTAINABILITY
Make a monthly or one-off donation
DONATE NOW
Help us with our hosting costs
SIGN UP TO SITEGROUND
We are always looking for citizen journalists
WRITE FOR US
Volunteer as an editor, in a technical role, or on social media
VOLUNTEER FOR US
Something else?
GET IN TOUCH
Previous slide
Next slide

LATEST

Riders on the storm by author Alastair McIntosh

Book Review: Riders on the Storm by Alastair McIntosh

December 7, 2023
The word humanity

Remember the call

December 7, 2023
Gaza Oct 23

Gaza’s statistics of death

December 7, 2023
hands holding candle

75 years since Universal Declaration of Human Rights: celebration at Sunderland Minster

December 6, 2023
Margaret Thatcher

In praise of Thatcher: has Starmer gone too far?

December 5, 2023
Two young women holding hands in demonstration

Human Rights Day

December 5, 2023

MOST READ

David Lammy

Lammy’s mood music – sidestepping towards Rejoin?

December 2, 2023
Margaret Thatcher

In praise of Thatcher: has Starmer gone too far?

December 5, 2023
Polling station

Proportional Representation vs First Past the Post

November 6, 2022 - Updated On May 23, 2023
Margaret Thatcher

Keir Starmer’s praise of Margaret Thatcher

December 4, 2023

BROWSE BY TAGS

Audio Beach Brexit Business castle leazes climate activism Co. Durham comedy cost of living crisis Culture defra democracy ducklings Economy Education Environment fire and rescue firefighter Food & Drink food poverty hardwick festival Health Health & Care Home Affairs just stop oil Lifestyle Local Lockdown Northumberland Peace peoples theatre Performance Politics pride month refugee rescue Science Teesside the good life TV & Radio Tynemouth Tyneside Ukraine volunteer Wearside

We are a not-for-profit citizen journalism publication. Our aim is to publish well-written, fact-based articles and opinion pieces on subjects that are of interest to people in the North East and beyond.

North East Bylines is a trading brand of Bylines Network Limited, which is a partner organisation to Byline Times.

Learn more about us

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Authors
  • Complaints
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Letters
  • Privacy
  • Network Map
  • Network RSS Feeds
  • Submission Guidelines

© 2023 North East Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Education
    • Environment
    • UK News
    • Transport
    • World News
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • Lifestyle
    • Culture
    • Music
    • Poetry
  • Business
    • Economy
    • Technology
    • Trade
  • Donate
  • Newsletter sign up
  • Boriiis Cartoons
  • Authors
  • Audio
CROWDFUNDER

© 2023 North East Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In