• Contact
  • About
DONATE
NEWSLETTER SIGN UP
  • Login
North East Bylines
  • Home
  • News
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Business
  • Region
  • Opinion
AUDIO
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Business
  • Region
  • Opinion
No Result
View All Result
North East Bylines
Home News Politics

Proportional Representation vs First Past the Post

James Rippon debates the political arguments for (and against) Proportional Representation and First Past the Post.

James RipponbyJames Rippon
06-11-2022 18:00 - Updated On 23-05-2023 13:07
in Politics, UK, UK News
Reading Time: 5 mins
A A
Polling station

Polling station Russss Creative Commons Zero, Public Domain Dedication

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

First published February 2022

The debate around which electoral system is better for a country has been continuously being discussed among both academics and politicians through several years. In this article we will discover why this is the case.

What do these terms mean?

The first past the post system is where voters cast their vote for a candidate of their choice, and the candidate who receives the most votes win, even if that candidate has less than 50% of the vote overall.

Proportional representation essentially means that the share of seats a party wins matches the share of votes it receives. There are many different systems of Proportional Representation, such as the ‘alternative vote’ method This means that instead of indicating support for only one candidate, voters can rank the candidates in order of preference. Ballots are initially counted for each voter’s top choice. If a candidate has more than half of the vote based on first choices, that candidate win and if not, then the candidate with the fewest votes is then eliminated.

What are the advantages of Proportional Representation?

Advocates for PR would state that this system is fairer than its counterpart as it completely represents the votes that each political party receives in an election. Meaning that the elected body will more likely represent more within society than first past the post.

It can also be said that coalitions that are usually formed between political parties in a PR system are very good for a democracy. It’s the thought that it gives the opportunity for a group representing a minority group to voice their opinion within the government. Therefore, making the government much more representative of the range of opinions within the country.

What are the disadvantages?

On the other hand, opponents of PR would conclude that it may lead to very unstable governments or may limit the ability of said governments to make changes. For example, in Israel there have been four legislative elections since April 2019 due to the formation of weak governments that kept hitting walls in terms of cooperation, therefore leading to the government achieving very little.

What are the advantages of first past the post (FPTP)?

Proponents of this system would argue that this system will result in strong governments with the norm being a single party holding a majority in a parliament. In contrast to PR this means that the government will be able to make changes with it being unlikely for it to be disrupted.

What are the disadvantages?

However, some believe that this system completely misrepresents the views of voters. A good example of this is the 2015 United Kingdom general election where the Conservative Party got 36.9% of the vote but 50.8% of the seats. This shows how despite most voters choosing another party to vote for a party with the minority of votes can control most of parliament.

As this system only permits one winner to be chosen in one constituency, this may result in thousands of votes end up being completely wasted. For example, in the 2005 United Kingdom general election, 52% of votes were for losing candidates. This could then have the knock-on effect of undermining the turnout of future elections, as some would see the lack of a point in voting if they do not count.

Can Proportional Representation be implemented in the UK?

At least in the short term this may seem very unlikely as the country had the opportunity to do away with the first past the post system. This was on 5 May 2011 where an Alternative Vote referendum took place due to being a provision of the Conservative–Liberal Democrat coalition agreement drawn up in 2010.

In this referendum there was a choice between that of the status quo (first past the post) and a system known as the ‘alternative vote’ (AV) method.

The results of the referendum however rejected the implementation of the AV method with 67.9% of people voted no with a 42.2% turnout. Showing that there was not much demand or interest about the issue amongst the populace, insinuating the change to proportional representation being very unlikely.

Despite this there are national movements such as Make Votes Matter who are for apply Proportional Representation into the UK voting system. With some separate aims such as securing a commitment to PR from the Labour Party, which appears to be gaining momentum as according to The Independent three-quarters of Labour members believe the party should commit to supporting proportional representation and adopt it as a policy.

Previous Post

The unsung heroes of the Tyne and Wear fire service

Next Post

Poison earth Part 1:  how Teesworks exports its toxic legacy

James Rippon

James Rippon

Related Posts

Conservative logo on Union flag
Opinion

Immigration policy: how the party of family values truly values your family

byRobin Tudge
December 8, 2023
Gaza Oct 23
Opinion

Gaza’s statistics of death

byDavid Keys
December 7, 2023
hands holding candle
Community

75 years since Universal Declaration of Human Rights: celebration at Sunderland Minster

byNorth East Bylines
December 6, 2023
Margaret Thatcher
North East

In praise of Thatcher: has Starmer gone too far?

byJulia Mazza
December 5, 2023
Two young women holding hands in demonstration
Politics

Human Rights Day

byPeter Sagar
December 5, 2023
Next Post
South Bank Quay

Poison earth Part 1:  how Teesworks exports its toxic legacy

PLEASE SUPPORT OUR CROWDFUNDER

Subscribe to our newsletters
CHOOSE YOUR NEWS
Follow us on social media
CHOOSE YOUR PLATFORMS
Download our app
ALL OF BYLINES IN ONE PLACE
Subscribe to our gazette
CONTRIBUTE TO OUR SUSTAINABILITY
Make a monthly or one-off donation
DONATE NOW
Help us with our hosting costs
SIGN UP TO SITEGROUND
We are always looking for citizen journalists
WRITE FOR US
Volunteer as an editor, in a technical role, or on social media
VOLUNTEER FOR US
Something else?
GET IN TOUCH
Previous slide
Next slide

LATEST

Conservative logo on Union flag

Immigration policy: how the party of family values truly values your family

December 8, 2023
Newcastle Civic Centre 

Newcastle City Council unveils youth justice plan

December 8, 2023
Riders on the storm by author Alastair McIntosh

Book Review: Riders on the Storm by Alastair McIntosh

December 7, 2023
The word humanity

Remember the call

December 7, 2023
Gaza Oct 23

Gaza’s statistics of death

December 7, 2023
hands holding candle

75 years since Universal Declaration of Human Rights: celebration at Sunderland Minster

December 6, 2023

MOST READ

David Lammy

Lammy’s mood music – sidestepping towards Rejoin?

December 2, 2023
Margaret Thatcher

In praise of Thatcher: has Starmer gone too far?

December 5, 2023
Gaza Oct 23

Gaza’s statistics of death

December 7, 2023
Polling station

Proportional Representation vs First Past the Post

November 6, 2022 - Updated On May 23, 2023

BROWSE BY TAGS

Audio Beach Brexit Business castle leazes climate activism Co. Durham comedy cost of living crisis Culture defra democracy ducklings Economy Education Environment fire and rescue firefighter Food & Drink food poverty hardwick festival Health Health & Care Home Affairs just stop oil Lifestyle Local Lockdown Northumberland Peace peoples theatre Performance Politics pride month refugee rescue Science Teesside the good life TV & Radio Tynemouth Tyneside Ukraine volunteer Wearside

We are a not-for-profit citizen journalism publication. Our aim is to publish well-written, fact-based articles and opinion pieces on subjects that are of interest to people in the North East and beyond.

North East Bylines is a trading brand of Bylines Network Limited, which is a partner organisation to Byline Times.

Learn more about us

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Authors
  • Complaints
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Letters
  • Privacy
  • Network Map
  • Network RSS Feeds
  • Submission Guidelines

© 2023 North East Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Education
    • Environment
    • UK News
    • Transport
    • World News
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • Lifestyle
    • Culture
    • Music
    • Poetry
  • Business
    • Economy
    • Technology
    • Trade
  • Donate
  • Newsletter sign up
  • Boriiis Cartoons
  • Authors
  • Audio
CROWDFUNDER

© 2023 North East Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In