• Contact
  • About
  • ISSN 3049-9763
  • Authors and editors
NEWSLETTER SIGN UP
North East Bylines
Advertisement
  • Home
  • News
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Business
  • Region
  • Opinion
AUDIO
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Business
  • Region
  • Opinion
No Result
View All Result
North East Bylines
Home Region Teesside

Darlington link road update

Further consultation, but a previous favoured route is chopped from the process

Daniel Hodgson by Daniel Hodgson
02-07-2026 08:00
in Teesside, Transport
Reading Time: 4 mins read
A A
A167 A1(M) Roundabout. Credit: Google Maps

A167 A1(M) Roundabout. Credit: Google Maps

Share on Bluesky

A proposed road that has been assigned a quarter of TVCA’s £1bn transport fund is to be consulted on yet again. Potential routes for the Darlington Northern Link Road are scheduled to go out for consultation in mid-July, but a previously favoured route has been chopped from the process.

Attempts to create a new road have been ongoing for a decade, with route option studies dating back to 2016. The project aims to create a “new strategic link” better connecting the A66 to the A1(M), according to TVCA, with the new road set to relieve congestion on the A1150 and A167.

“Perfect” route

The latest development has brought some unhappiness, with Darlington Conservative Councillor Andy Keir, highlighting that the previously chosen “perfect” route is now not included in the latest selection process.

Speaking at this month’s TVCA overview and scrutiny committee meeting, Whinfield ward Cllr Keir said people in his area are “scratching their heads” as to why the route is no longer available. This route would have bypassed the A1150 and A167 and connected the A66 Little Burdon roundabout with junction 59 of the A1(M).

Tees Valley Tory Mayor Ben Houchen said there was a “different” situation today compared to when the original consultation took place.

It was reported last year that the scheme was under review, with a longlist of options confirmed earlier this year. The 250mn assigned for the project is part of the Tees Valley’s £1bn transport fund, which is to be used between 2026/27 and 2031/32.

A bypass is needed

Cllr Keir told the Local Democracy Reporting Service that he is against any of the routes that are now being considered as none of the alternatives serve as a bypass, as they all merge with the A167, meaning that there would be a “pinch point” on that road.  He said he is “asking questions” as to why the original route has been taken out. Cllr Keir added everyone “wants a bypass” and thinks one is “needed”.

At June’s overview meeting, Mayor Houchen said that the Department for Transport will not sign off on a project unless “it adds value” and other strict technical requirements. Mayor Houchen said he had received advice that DfT will not sign off on the original route, “because of the water that has gone under the bridge since that original decision”. 

He said one of the major issues between the original consultation and now is that Darlington Council has adopted a masterplan for the north of the town. Within that masterplan, the council has agreed “significant road infrastructure”. As a result, DfT would potentially reject a “much bigger, more expensive road”, when the council has agreed a road that is going to be installed as part of the masterplan. 

Mayor Houchen said this meant a return to “square one” of where the road could go and what it could look like, with the options appraisal including the original route. Now, two favoured routes will be reduced to just one, following consultation, and this will be recommended to DfT. 

During the meeting, Cllr Keir said: “It doesn’t take away from the fact that we need a bypass, and that road if it goes anywhere other than up to the roundabout up the top end [A1(M) junction], is not a bypass. All you’re doing is shifting traffic from one side of the gridlock to the middle of the gridlock and I think it’s ridiculous.” 

Consultation is set to get underway this July and Mayor Houchen said National Highways will not grant access from Cllr Keir’s “preferred option” onto the motorway, so it cannot be included in consultation, as it is not deliverable.

Friends of Bylines Network

There has never been a greater need for grassroots journalism that investigates the stories that really matter, holds power to account and champions the voices of everyday citizens. We are proudly powered by volunteers but what we do isn’t free.

STAND WITH US for independent, citizen-led journalism that makes democracy stronger, and you will even get some exclusive benefits.

BECOME A FRIEND
Previous Post

Government remembers it has a plan for the regions too

Next Post

The binary trap: why one opinion doesn’t define politics

Daniel Hodgson

Daniel Hodgson

Daniel Hodgson is a Local Democracy Reporting Service reporter

Related Posts

footbridge
Business

Another day at the Teesworks flagship: SeAH Wind publishes its annual accounts

by Ray Casey
14 September 2026
Victoria Viaduct, photo by Ray Casey
Transport

The Tyne & Wear Metro is coming to Washington: here’s a preview

by Ray Casey
13 September 2026
A train decked out in the new GBR livery. Credit: UK Government
Transport

New trains for Middlesbrough

by Daniel Hodgson
13 September 2026
Stockton Middlesbrough map
Teesside

The Teesside we lost

by John Hall
12 September 2026
David Milligan
Northumberland

A former hospital consultant now paralysed from the neck down in an A1 crash says dualling the road is only half the job

by Andy Cooper
11 September 2026
Next Post
Houses of Parliament

The binary trap: why one opinion doesn’t define politics

PLEASE SUPPORT OUR CROWDFUNDER

BROWSE BY TAGS

#BenHouchen Ben Houchen Business Co. Durham community Culture Darlington Durham Economy Education entertainment Environment Equality Finance Funding Gateshead Hartlepool Health History Housing Human Rights Local Lockdown Middlesbrough Newcastle North East Northumberland Online safety opinion Peace Politics Redcar Short Story Sunday STDC Stockton Sunderland Technology Teesside Teesworks Transport TVCA Tyneside Ukraine Wearside Which?

We are a not-for-profit citizen journalism publication. Our aim is to publish well-written, fact-based articles and opinion pieces on subjects that are of interest to people in the North East and beyond.

North East Bylines is a trading brand of Bylines Networks Limited which is separate to, but allied with, Byline Times.

Learn more about us

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Authors and editors
  • Complaints
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Letters
  • Privacy
  • Network Map
  • Network RSS Feeds
  • Submission Guidelines
  • Download the Bylines Network App

© 2020-2026 North East Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9763

No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Education
    • Environment
    • UK News
    • Transport
    • World News
  • Opinion
  • Lifestyle
    • Culture
    • Music
    • Poetry
  • Business
    • Economy
    • Technology
    • Trade
  • Audio
  • Authors and editors

Newsletter sign up

CROWDFUNDER

© 2020-2026 North East Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9763