• Contact
  • About
DONATE
NEWSLETTER SIGN UP
  • Login
North East Bylines
  • Home
  • News
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Business
  • Region
  • Opinion
AUDIO
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Business
  • Region
  • Opinion
No Result
View All Result
North East Bylines
Home News European News

Standards, sewage and sleaze in the House of Commons

A government compromise aimed at cutting raw sewage dumping by water companies was passed by MPs on Monday after Conservative rebels backed ministers

Richard HensonbyRichard Henson
09-11-2021 17:45 - Updated On 04-04-2022 16:28
in European News, Politics, UK, UK News
Reading Time: 6 mins
A A
sewage pipes

Discharge of sewage into a river Photo from iStock (licenced to editor)

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Water, water, everywhere… (but no PM and not a drop to swim in?)

Tories 283, Opposition 163. Blink and you missed it!

So what did happen yesterday?

It all started with a video from DEFRA, a report from ENDS, both discussed in an appearance of Fergal Sharkey on Good Morning Britain, and a critique on twitter of the government amendment on sewage.

News had already been circulating on Twitter that there was to be a vote in the House of Commons on an adjusted version of the government proposals on managing sewage.

This seemed to be rather short notice, with last week’s business of Parliamentary Standards still very much in the air. Indeed, as the House of Commons schedule became available, it became clear that Parliamentary Standards was going to be the main business of the day. Surely they wouldn’t try to squeeze in a vote on sewage management, not while everyone was focused on the blatant interference with the Parliamentary Standards Committee that had been achieved, and then even more dramatically withdrawn on Thursday and Friday of last week?

Oh yes they would… it was the next business on the agenda!

Inside the House of Commons

For much of the day, it has to be said, the highly apt hashtag #SewageScandal was flying high on Twitter. Many had commented on the revised government text, many had already seen the video, and many had drawn their own conclusions….  Many more would have emailed their MP exercising their disapproval of that revised text and told their MP that the Lords amendment gave far better safeguards for the consumer.

This, then, was the fevered background for the Parliamentary Standards debate. However, fewer than 50 MPs were present on the government benches. The PM was in Hexham, Northumberland, visiting a hospital and a beleaguered Police and Crime Commissioner … whilst the MP for Hexham was in Westminster. Rather odd, and many opposition MPs expressed surprise.

The standards debate was rather absorbing, with some excellent contributions. It was very much bloody nose time for the beleaguered leader of the House, who did not speak, even to say “Sorry”.

Keir Starmer was damning in his summary. So, would they now overturn last week’s vote? The fact that less than 50 Tory MPs were in the house – and many of those were critical – suggested surrender. The Twitter hashtags became populated with #JohnsonOut and #ResignReesMogg type messages.

But why were there so few MPs in the chamber? This was a bit of a mystery. Some commented that the opposition would easily win the sewage management vote, when the time came. The government were being trashed, and the PM was being harangued on social media for his favourite act of defiance… not wearing a mask when on outreach. And this continued for three hours! The PM was back in Westminster but did not show. No government proposals, and therefore no votes.

The charge of the Tory Brigade

After the very entertaining business of trashing the government was over, the next item on the agenda was the Sewage Management aspect of the Environment Bill. More than 230 other Tory MPs who had been hiding away somewhere suddenly entered the chamber for this debate, and in good time to participate in a vote on a government text that had already been voted down in the Lords, but had now been “adjusted” and approved.

The swelled Tory ranks were told by the proposer that this new offering was even better than the Lords amendment, that no vote would therefore be taken on the Lords amendment, and that they should vote on the government amendment alone. There was heated debate! Phillip Dunn, member for Ludlow, who had voted against last time, had changed his mind. He also engaged in debate through an influential twitter thread.

Opposition members certainly hadn’t been talked around, however! For a start, there was… no timetable for action!

When a vote was taken, the result was…  283/163, a 120 government majority. Opposition numbers did not include SNP members, and could only rustle up 163 votes. It is described here. This was also described to some extent (not easy!) in BBC Sounds Yesterday in Parliament.

Where next?

There is a good summary of events in The Guardian.

The fact that the Lords’ amendment wasn’t even discussed appears to be contrary to democracy, and it is a surprise that the speaker approved this.

It now goes back to the Lords, so anyone unhappy at the events described should write to their Lordships, and should request that they do not give up, but push their amendment back to the House of Commons so it can actually be debated.

It seems unusual that a Lords’ amendment has been rejected in this way, and this should not be the end of the matter. 

Writing to the Lords follows quite a different arrangement to MP lobbying – the Best for Britain website can advise on which Lords to write to based on postcode. Use the tool link just to find your Lords and get their email addresses. Then email them separately.

Good luck!

Previous Post

Johnson maskless in Hexham hospital despite increased Covid cases in Westminster

Next Post

A successful bonfire night in Northumberland and Tyne & Wear

Richard Henson

Richard Henson

Related Posts

Keir Starmer
Politics

Starmer’s message

byJohn Forth-Walker
December 3, 2023
Palestinians and Israelis book by Michael Scott-Baumann
Books

Book review: Palestinians and Israelis

byGiuseppe Bignardi
December 1, 2023
COP28 Trees
Environment

What can we expect from COP28?

byNeil Taylor
November 30, 2023
Saudi flag
North East

Saudi Arabia – what can local politicians do?

byColin Taylor
November 28, 2023
Geert Wilders
Politics

Far-right roundup

byRobin Tudge
November 28, 2023
Next Post
Fireworks in Allendale

A successful bonfire night in Northumberland and Tyne & Wear

PLEASE SUPPORT OUR CROWDFUNDER

Subscribe to our newsletters
CHOOSE YOUR NEWS
Follow us on social media
CHOOSE YOUR PLATFORMS
Download our app
ALL OF BYLINES IN ONE PLACE
Subscribe to our gazette
CONTRIBUTE TO OUR SUSTAINABILITY
Make a monthly or one-off donation
DONATE NOW
Help us with our hosting costs
SIGN UP TO SITEGROUND
We are always looking for citizen journalists
WRITE FOR US
Volunteer as an editor, in a technical role, or on social media
VOLUNTEER FOR US
Something else?
GET IN TOUCH
Previous slide
Next slide

LATEST

Germany on the map of the world

German Journeys Part 11: The Goethe Institute

December 3, 2023
Keir Starmer

Starmer’s message

December 3, 2023
global warming

Climate education must extend beyond the classroom’s walls

December 3, 2023
National Servicemen Michael Jamieson

Last of the National Servicemen Part 3: Sent to Coventry

December 2, 2023
curriculum for the North

A new Curriculum for the North

December 2, 2023
David Lammy

Lammy’s mood music – sidestepping towards Rejoin?

December 2, 2023

MOST READ

Nestle Fawdon

New buyer for Fawdon Nestlé chocolate site

November 28, 2023
Photo by Fred Duval/Shutterstock.com (YW)

Cleverly and Stockton

November 27, 2023
David Lammy

Lammy’s mood music – sidestepping towards Rejoin?

December 2, 2023
Bollard in Geelong

What news from Geelong? The show goes on with Britishvolt

November 24, 2023 - Updated On November 27, 2023

BROWSE BY TAGS

Audio Beach Brexit Business castle leazes climate activism Co. Durham comedy cost of living crisis Culture defra democracy ducklings Economy Education Environment fire and rescue firefighter Food & Drink food poverty hardwick festival Health Health & Care Home Affairs just stop oil Lifestyle Local Lockdown Northumberland Peace peoples theatre Performance Politics pride month refugee rescue Science Teesside the good life TV & Radio Tynemouth Tyneside Ukraine volunteer Wearside

We are a not-for-profit citizen journalism publication. Our aim is to publish well-written, fact-based articles and opinion pieces on subjects that are of interest to people in the North East and beyond.

North East Bylines is a trading brand of Bylines Network Limited, which is a partner organisation to Byline Times.

Learn more about us

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Authors
  • Complaints
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Letters
  • Privacy
  • Network Map
  • Network RSS Feeds
  • Submission Guidelines

© 2023 North East Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Education
    • Environment
    • UK News
    • Transport
    • World News
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • Lifestyle
    • Culture
    • Music
    • Poetry
  • Business
    • Economy
    • Technology
    • Trade
  • Donate
  • Newsletter sign up
  • Boriiis Cartoons
  • Authors
  • Audio
CROWDFUNDER

© 2023 North East Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In