• Contact
  • About
  • ISSN 3049-9763
  • Authors and editors
NEWSLETTER SIGN UP
North East Bylines
Advertisement
  • Home
  • News
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Business
  • Region
  • Opinion
AUDIO
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Business
  • Region
  • Opinion
No Result
View All Result
North East Bylines
Home News Community

Middlesbrough: Digital ID views

Mandatory digital IDs? The view from Linthorpe Road

Daniel Hodgson by Daniel Hodgson
01-10-2025 11:00
in Community, Politics
Reading Time: 4 mins read
A A
(L-R) Teesside University students Amy and Milly. Photo by Daniel Hodgson

(L-R) Teesside University students Amy and Milly. Photo by Daniel Hodgson

Share on Bluesky

The people of Middlesbrough have shared their views on government plans to introduce digital ID. Locals on Linthorpe Road had contrasting reactions, with some ardently against the plans which are set to be mandatory in the coming years, while others were more blasé and a sizeable minority of people who spoke to the Local Democracy Reporting Service (LDRS) were in favour of the proposals. 

ID proposal

The Labour government has set out its ambition to see digital IDs rolled out across the country before the next general election, which must be held by summer 2029. The government argues that the measures will help curb illegal immigration. It will be compulsory for people to have a digital ID if they want to work in the country, but the plans will be optional for students and pensioners.

By their digital nature, these IDs won’t be carried around, but rather take the form of an app, like the NHS app. The change means that employers will no longer be able to rely on a National Insurance number. Various opposition parties in Westminster have spoken against the plans, with civil liberties groups also voicing concerns.

Middlesbrough’s people comments

In Middlesbrough town centre, Vernon Ferguson, 55, was strongly opposed to the proposals, arguing that those who don’t go along with the plans won’t be able to go to the bank, won’t be able to get any type of credit, won’t be able to get anything, adding: “Hopefully, the whole country will go against it.” Mr Ferguson, who previously worked off shore for 18 years, said that the kids of today won’t realise what liberties and rights they’ve lost. 

Meanwhile, 66 year old retired truck driver Ian Sheavills thought the government plans were a “good idea”, saying he’d had a digital ID for 22 years during his time in the army, adding: “If you’ve got nothing to hide, what’s the problem?”

Further down Linthorpe Road, Maria, 58, who works as a cleaner, said: “I don’t see why I should have to get an ID, when I’m British anyway and I’ve worked all my life.” Meanwhile, her sister, 63 year old Wendy, who doesn’t work through bad health, said she’d heard all about the plans on the telly. Neither of them were convinced by the government’s argument that it would help reduce illegal immigration.

When 24 year old Jamie was asked for his thoughts on the government’s plans, he said: “Idiots. They’re just trying to lock everyone down.” He was worried it would be like Covid all over, highlighting how everyone wore a mask when they were told, adding: “It’s like puppets to them aren’t we?” When challenged on the potential of not being able to get a job without a digital ID, he said he still wouldn’t comply.

Milly, 19, and Amy, 20, are both students studying psychology at Teesside University. Neither of them were particularly familiar with the plans and Milly asked what would happen if someone didn’t have a digital ID – a challenge that has been put to government ministers.

Amy, who is from Hartlepool, said: “I suppose it doesn’t really matter for us like young people, because we’ve got access to phones, but if it was someone older, that’s where it would be a problem.”

Both Milly, who is from County Durham, and Amy work part time alongside their studies, so even as students, the digital ID would be compulsory for them, with both agreeing that they weren’t strongly in favour or against the plans, as it wouldn’t affect them too much. 

Construction worker Peter Winkworth thought that the digital ID plans were a good idea and when asked why he was in favour, he said: “Why not?” When it comes to civil liberty concerns, he said: “What civil liberties are they going to take from us… it’s not going to stop you going to the pub or doing anything you want!”

As for curbing illegal immigration, the 64 year old thought that digital ID could play its part, as the system would be keeping track of people who aren’t supposed to be in the country. Meanwhile, a  76 year old, who didn’t wish to give his name, and had immigrated to the UK in the 1960s and worked all his life for British Steel said he was “all for” the digital ID plans.

CLICK HERE TO DONATE TO OUR CROWDFUNDER

HELP US BECOME STRONGER SO THAT WE CAN CONTINUE TO DELIVER POWERFUL CITIZEN JOURNALISM!

Tags: Digital IDMiddlesbroughopinionPolicyPolitics
Previous Post

Big-name comedians head to Riyadh festival amid accusations of entertainment-washing

Next Post

How Trump’s Gaza peace plan ignores the lessons of history

Daniel Hodgson

Daniel Hodgson

Daniel Hodgson is a Local Democracy Reporting Service reporter

Related Posts

Bring it on Boro
Community

Even more children can enjoy Bring it on Boro this half term

by North East Bylines
24 October 2026
map showing Yemen and Saudi
Politics

Why the USA is refusing to support Saudi Arabia against the Houthis

by Daniel Finlay
24 October 2026
Red Squirrel on a tree branch
Community

£250,000 bid to support local North East action for red squirrels

by Peter Sagar
24 October 2026
Donald Trump
Equality

Trump sides with dictators…again

by Peter Sagar
23 October 2026
Reform UK
Opinion

Will Reform UK’s racism scandal cost votes?

by Thomas Lockwood
22 October 2026
Next Post
IDF soldiers preparing for ground activity in Gaza

How Trump's Gaza peace plan ignores the lessons of history

PLEASE SUPPORT OUR CROWDFUNDER

BROWSE BY TAGS

#BenHouchen Ben Houchen Business Co. Durham community Culture Darlington Durham Economy Education entertainment Environment Equality Finance Funding Gateshead Hartlepool Health History Housing Human Rights Investment Local Lockdown Middlesbrough Newcastle North East Northumberland Online safety opinion Peace Politics Redcar STDC Stockton Sunderland Technology Teesside Teesworks Transport TVCA Tyneside Ukraine Wearside Which?

We are a not-for-profit citizen journalism publication. Our aim is to publish well-written, fact-based articles and opinion pieces on subjects that are of interest to people in the North East and beyond.

North East Bylines is a trading brand of Bylines Networks Limited which is separate to, but allied with, Byline Times.

Learn more about us

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Authors and editors
  • Complaints
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Letters
  • Privacy
  • Network Map
  • Network RSS Feeds
  • Submission Guidelines
  • Download the Bylines Network App

© 2020-2026 North East Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9763

No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Education
    • Environment
    • UK News
    • Transport
    • World News
  • Opinion
  • Lifestyle
    • Culture
    • Music
    • Poetry
  • Business
    • Economy
    • Technology
    • Trade
  • Audio
  • Authors and editors

Newsletter sign up

CROWDFUNDER

© 2020-2026 North East Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9763